'Organization Structure Essay\r'

'Tips: Or you nookie approach this way:\r\n1. Briefly set up the non-homogeneous organisational theories.\r\n2. Mention that you will localize analysing twain theories, where examples of principle and practice thunder mug be found from the gaucherie study, for the purpose of this task. Analyse how organizational theory underpins principles and practice of organizing and management.\r\na. Briefly antedate the various organizational theories (Scientific management, classical administration and etc)\r\nb. Analyse in details the various organizational theories in terms of its principles and practice.\r\n( Analysis: 1.Explain what they are, 2.describe their characteristics and under what circumstances each of them may be useful and 3.evaluate their\r\nstrengths and weaknesses)\r\nc. Relate these theories, where appropriate and applicable, to the case study.\r\nd. Draw a short conclusion\r\nTips: Or you can approach this way:\r\n1. Briefly introduce the various organizational th eories.\r\n2. Mention that you will accent analysing two theories, where examples of principle and practice can be found from the case study, for the purpose of this task.1. Draw the organizational mental synthesiss for both firms\r\n†You should be able to see the differences of the two organizational buildings: Tall and short hierarchical structure, shorten and wide span of management, specialization by geographical or functions or something else.\r\n†These diagrams serve as the seat for you to do the following compare and tune.\r\n2. Compare and contrast the differences of organizational structures between the firms\r\n†Based on the in a higher place diagrams, do the compare and contrast. †Compare and contrast convey you need to find out:\r\n* What are the things akin between the two companies?\r\n* What are the differences between the two companies?\r\nSample answer for 2\r\na. Organizational structure\r\nGiven the diagram, it is clear that both co mpanies have a formal\r\norganizational structure. There are as yet differences between the two companies.\r\nFirst, political boss Ltd is taller than agar in organizational hierarchy. (Plagarism is a serious offence. This content can be found at http://btechnd.blogpot.com/) This is due to the structure necessarily to support Boss Ltd’s geographical and product divisions that accommodate 400 more ply than Agar Ltd(Plagarism is a serious offence. This content can be found at http://btechnd.blogpot.com) . In contrast, Agar has a layer reporting hierarchy. Its line of ascendency is shorter than that of Boss Ltd.\r\nSecond, the span of management, in the case of Boss Ltd, is narrower than that of Agar. That being the case, a stronger degree of decentralised last making is practised in Boss. Agar’s decision making mainly centralized to the chief operating officer himself.\r\n'